Yes — background music can increase revenue, but the effect is conditional. A landmark 1982 study showed a 38% daily revenue lift from slow music. But a 2025 field study across 140 real stores found tempo alone showed no overall effect — until they looked at loyalty members and context variables, revealing that music’s revenue impact depends on who’s in the store. In this video I reconcile the positive findings (38% grocery lifts, 40% bar revenue increases, 12% tempo-mode effects) with the nuanced 140-store null result, and explain the context-dependency principle that determines whether music moves your revenue.
Can background music actually increase revenue? Not “make people feel nice” — actually move the top line? The answer is yes, and the effect sizes in the research are frankly embarrassing for any retailer who’s still running their store in silence or off a random playlist. We’re talking 15% per check in restaurants. 38% in daily grocery sales. And in one case, a 40% lift in bar revenue from changing a single variable.
Restaurants #
Let’s start with the cleanest revenue data. A field experiment published in Perceptual and Motor Skills tested what happened when a restaurant simply turned the volume down. Not changed the genre. Not changed the tempo. Just… softer. The average check went up by $3.05 — roughly 15%. Genre didn’t matter. That’s pure revenue lift from a volume knob. A separate study in the Journal of Consumer Research found an even bigger effect through tempo. Slow-tempo background music in a restaurant kept diners at the table 11 minutes longer. Those extra minutes translated into approximately 3 additional drinks per table, driving bar revenue up by roughly 40%. The food bill stayed the same. The profit came entirely from lingering — from customers who felt comfortable enough to stay and order another round.
Retail #
In retail, the foundational study was published in the Journal of Marketing in 1982. A supermarket alternated between slow-tempo, fast-tempo, and no music across a two-month period. Slow-tempo days averaged $16,740 in daily sales. Fast-tempo days averaged $12,113. That’s a $4,627-per-day revenue gap. Annualized, we’re talking hundreds of thousands of dollars — from background music. And the mechanism was straightforward: slow music made people move through the store more slowly, which increased browsing time, which increased basket size.
But It’s Not Just “play Slow Music” #
Now, here’s where most people stop and conclude “just play slow music.” That’s wrong. A massive real-world study from the Journal of Retailing tracked 43,676 shopping baskets and found that tempo’s revenue effect depends entirely on store density. In crowded conditions, fast tempo actually outperformed — by roughly 8%. Why? Because when a store is packed, slow music creates a traffic jam. People feel stuck and frustrated, and frustrated shoppers buy less. Fast music helped them navigate efficiently and still purchase. The revenue-maximizing tempo flips depending on how many people are in your store at any given moment.
The Quality Escalator #
There’s also a subtler revenue mechanism: music can shift customers toward higher-priced products without changing purchase volume. A study in Advances in Consumer Research found that classical music in a wine store didn’t increase the number of bottles sold — but it significantly increased the price point of bottles selected. Same transaction count. Higher average ticket. And a study in Environment and Behavior replicated this in restaurants: classical music pushed the average spend to about £32.50 per head versus roughly £29.50 for pop — which was basically identical to silence. The right music doesn’t just increase volume. It increases the quality tier of what people choose.
The Entuned Connection #
The research is unambiguous: background music can increase revenue. But only if it’s the right music, at the right tempo, at the right volume, for the right context. And that context changes — by hour, by traffic level, by season. This is why Entuned exists. We generate music that’s calibrated to your store’s real-time conditions, using the same variables these studies identified as revenue drivers. Not a playlist someone vibes with. A system that’s engineered to perform.
Chapters
Can background music actually increase revenue? #
Yes, but the size of the effect depends on context. The 1982 grocery study showed a 38% daily revenue lift ($4,627/day) from slow music. The 1986 restaurant study showed a 40% bar revenue lift. But a 2025 study of 140 stores found that tempo alone didn’t produce a significant overall effect — the lift appeared primarily among loyalty members and depended on other variables like crowd density, mode, and sensory alignment.
If a 140-store study found no overall effect, doesn't that disprove the earlier research? #
No — it refines it. Think of it like aspirin: it works on headaches, but if you test it on 140 people and only some have headaches, the average effect looks small. The 2017 study (43,676 transactions) showed the same thing — fast music helped revenue in crowded stores but hurt it in empty ones. The effect is real but conditional. You have to manage the full set of variables.
So what variables do I actually need to get right? #
The research identifies six: tempo, volume, mode (major/minor key), brand fit, crowd density, and sensory alignment (music + scent + lighting should match energy level). Getting one right and the others wrong can produce zero effect. For a system that manages all of these together, try Entuned free at entuned.co. Full citations in the description. This is video 7 of 50 in this series.
References
- EMAC (2025). Field study across 140 retail stores on the effect of music tempo on sales and employee satisfaction. European Marketing Academy Conference Proceedings.
- Milliman, R. E. (1982). Using background music to affect the behavior of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 86–91.
- Milliman, R. E. (1986). The influence of background music on the behavior of restaurant patrons. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 286–289.
- Lammers, H. B. (2003). An oceanside field experiment on background music effects on the restaurant tab. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(3), 1025–1026.
- Knoferle, K. M., et al. (2012). It is all in the mix: The interactive effect of music tempo and mode on in-store sales. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 325–337.
- Knoferle, K. M., Paus, V. C., & Vossen, A. (2017). An upbeat crowd: Fast in-store music alleviates the negative effects of high social density on customers' spending. Journal of Retailing, 93(4), 541–549.
- Mattila, A. S., & Wirtz, J. (2001). Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 273–289.
- Spangenberg, E. R., et al. (2005). It's beginning to smell (and sound) a lot like Christmas. Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1583–1589.